A Reply to Our Critics

Issue Date January 2025
Volume 36
Issue 1
Page Numbers 182–187
file Print
arrow-down-thin Download from Project MUSE
external View Citation

Read the full essay here.

This essay identifies four broad themes in the responses — by Ross Mittiga, Elisabeth Ellis, Thea Riofrancos, and Emilie Hafner-Burton and colleagues — to “Resisting the Authoritarian Temptation.” First, this essay reiterates the utter seriousness with which the authors take the climate threat and the need for energy transition. Second, it strongly resists the charge that eco-authoritarianism is a strawman. Third, it addresses the critique that the authors have underplayed the fossil-fuel industry’s role in climate politics, in both democratic and authoritarian contexts. And finally, the essay reassures our critics that we by no means endorse the institutional status quo. On the contrary, as “Resisting the Authoritarian Temptation” concludes, a key democratic strength is institutional dynamism and flexibility in the face of novel challenges. Climate change is a gargantuan challenge, but democracy offers the best available toolkit to address it.

About the Authors

Nomi Claire Lazar

Nomi Claire Lazar is professor in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa.

View all work by Nomi Claire Lazar

Jeremy Wallace

Jeremy Wallace is A. Doak Barnett Professor of China Studies at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.

View all work by Jeremy Wallace

Image Credit: Linh Do via Flickr