Liberal Democracy in an Age of Immigration

Issue Date October 2024
Volume 35
Issue 4
Page Numbers 63–77
file Print
arrow-down-thin Download from Project MUSE
external View Citation

Read the full essay here.

Across democracies, there are concerns that immigration poses threats to liberal democracy. The conventional narrative focuses on two threats. First, as migrant inflows and ethnic diversity have risen, so has public support for nativist radical-right parties who are only weakly attached to democracy. Second, migrants themselves adhere to comparatively illiberal positions on a range of issues, with adverse consequences for liberalism. These narratives place the blame on mass publics. By contrast, this essay argues that mainstream political elites are frequently at fault. Even though large popular majorities are wedded to liberal democracy and open to immigration, mainstream parties have consistently adopted rhetoric and campaign strategies that legitimize and empower native and migrant citizens who promote illiberal politics. To the extent that immigration presents risks to liberal democracy, centrist political elites have facilitated and escalated these threats.

About the Author

Rafaela Dancygier is IBM Chair in International Studies and professor of politics at Princeton University. Her books include Dilemmas of Inclusion: Muslims in European Politics (2017) and Immigration and Conflict in Europe (2010).

View all work by Rafaela Dancygier

Image Credit: Mstyslav Chernov