When Should the Majority Rule?

Issue Date January 2025
Volume 36
Issue 1
Page Numbers 5–20
file Print
arrow-down-thin Download from Project MUSE
external View Citation

Read the full essay here.

When do limits on majorities enhance democratic rule, and when do they undermine it? Constraints on majorities are, of course, essential to modern democracy. Liberal democracy is not simply a system of majority rule: It combines majority rule and protection of minority rights. But constraints on electoral majorities can also subvert democracy. This essay offers a new framework for understanding the ambiguous relationship between countermajoritarianism and contemporary democracy. Lumping all countermajoritarian institutions into the same category can lead us to preserve and prescribe outdated and undemocratic institutions that distort political competition and may undermine democratic legitimacy. This essay makes the case for a robust but minimalist countermajoritarianism. Although special protections for powerful minorities may have helped to secure the historical passage to democracy, today the healthiest democracies empower majorities.

About the Authors

Steven Levitsky

Steven Levitsky is David Rockefeller Professor of Latin American Studies and professor of government and director of the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies at Harvard University.

View all work by Steven Levitsky

Daniel Ziblatt

Daniel Ziblatt is director of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies at Harvard University, where he is also Eaton Professor of Government. He is co-author, with Steven Levitsky, of Tyranny of the Minority (2023) and How Democracies Die (2018).

View all work by Daniel Ziblatt

Image Credit: Janos Kummer/Getty Images